{"id":26092,"date":"2023-05-09T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-05-09T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/news\/aha-submits-testimony-opposing-ohio-learning-standards-legislation-may-2023\/"},"modified":"2024-06-20T21:25:54","modified_gmt":"2024-06-21T01:25:54","slug":"aha-submits-testimony-opposing-ohio-learning-standards-legislation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/news\/aha-submits-testimony-opposing-ohio-learning-standards-legislation\/","title":{"rendered":"AHA Submits Testimony Opposing Ohio Learning Standards Legislation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The AHA has submitted testimony to the Ohio House Primary and Secondary Education Committee expressing \u201cgrave concern\u201d about House Bill 103, which would create a new, politically appointed task force to produce state social studies standards. The legislation, the AHA wrote, \u201cwould create an entirely new bureaucratic apparatus as a strategy for overruling an open, democratic, and professional process.\u201d Additionally, HB 103 singles out the American Birthright model standards, which emphasize \u201ccontent in place of critical thinking \u2026 focus[ing] narrowly on lessons about how students should feel about the United States,\u201d as the basis for \u201ca radical overhaul of history and social studies education in Ohio.\u201d<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">May 9, 2023<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Ohio House Primary and Secondary Education Committee<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">House Bill 103 Interested Party Testimony<br \/>\nAmerican Historical Association<\/p>\n<p>Chairman Bird and members of the House Primary and Secondary Education Committee,<\/p>\n<p>Thank you for the opportunity to submit interested party testimony regarding House Bill (HB) 103. The American Historical Association (AHA) wishes to express grave concern about a measure that would inject politics into the process of drafting state history and social studies learning standards.<\/p>\n<p>Ohio does not need a new, politically appointed task force \u201cto produce statewide academic standards in social studies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The state <a title=\"Ohio\u2019s Learning Standards Review Process\" href=\"https:\/\/education.ohio.gov\/getattachment\/Topics\/Learning-in-Ohio\/Standard-Revision-Overview\/StandardsRevisonProcess.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Department of Education already does this work<\/a>\u2014and does it well\u2014in accordance with widely recognized professional norms codified in the <a title=\"Criteria for Standards in History\/Social Studies\/Social Sciences (updated 2019) | AHA\" href=\"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/jobs-and-professional-development\/statements-standards-and-guidelines-of-the-discipline\/criteria-for-standards-in-history\/social-studies\/social-sciences\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AHA\u2019s criteria<\/a> on state standards revision. The creation of this new body sidesteps both professional staff at the Ohio Department of Education and the 19 members of the State Board of Education, 11 of whom are elected. Few Ohioans will agree with the premise that the state needs more bureaucracy. Fewer still are likely to support the idea that yet another board with an unambiguously political mandate would streamline the already complicated process of crafting education policy.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s more, HB 103 singles out the American Birthright model standards as the basis for a radical overhaul of history and social studies education in Ohio. These standards are not the product of an evidence-based study; they are merely a risky, untested document that, if they were adopted, would impose wrenching opportunity costs on Ohio students, parents, teachers, and schools.<\/p>\n<p>Emphasizing content in place of critical thinking, American Birthright focuses narrowly on lessons about how students should feel about the United States. The AHA is not opposed to history education with a patriotic bent. But patriotism does not require sacrificing the complexity, contingency, and conflict that produced our world; instead, the version of history here is distorted and flattened, resulting in a narrative in which neither the US nor Europe ever change in any meaningful way. For example, American Birthright ignores emancipation and the eventual abolition of slavery among the \u201cvarious effects of the Civil War.\u201d This is the kind of intellectual contortion required to support the contention that the US is and always has been perfect. And world history, by this dangerously Victorian reckoning, is reduced to a sideshow about the \u201ccivilizing process,\u201d in which \u201cwarlike\u201d non-Western societies gradually give way before the unrelenting march of \u201ccivilization.\u201d Without ever meaningfully engaging with any evidence to the contrary, American Birthright offers a pleasant fantasy in which European empires merely \u201cunited largely separate regions and gave birth to new nations in the Americas and Australasia.\u201d At a time when Ohio should be offering its students the best and broadest educational opportunities to stay competitive in the world economy, these standards instead have the potential to hobble students with a parochial worldview and deprive them of the chance to become tomorrow\u2019s global leaders.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever the merits or flaws of American Birthright, however, this is a bill that undermines professional history education in Ohio. It would create an entirely new bureaucratic apparatus as a strategy for overruling an open, democratic, and professional process simply because this bill\u2019s sponsors did not get to dictate the terms of history education in the state through established channels. Ohio\u2019s students deserve better.<\/p>\n<p>Thank you for your consideration of the AHA\u2019s perspectives on HB 103 and the supremely important issue of history learning standards in public education.<\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p>The AHA is America\u2019s largest and oldest organization of professional historians, with over 11,000 members engaged in the teaching and practice of history at colleges and universities, secondary schools, historical institutes, museums, and other institutions. The AHA membership represents every historical era and geographical area. Founded in 1884 and incorporated by Congress in 1889 for the promotion of historical studies, the Association provides leadership for the discipline, helps to sustain and enhance the work of historians, and promotes the critical role of historical thinking in public life. Everything has a history.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The AHA has submitted testimony to the Ohio House Primary and Secondary Education Committee expressing \u201cgrave concern\u201d about House Bill&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":17025,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"%%post_title%%","_seopress_titles_desc":"The AHA has submitted testimony to the Ohio House Primary and Secondary Education Committee expressing \u201cgrave concern\u201d about House Bill 103, which would create a new, politically appointed task force to produce state social studies standards.","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"aha-topic":[],"month":[556],"geographic-taxonomy":[],"post-type":[10,613],"thematic-taxonomy":[],"year":[105],"class_list":{"0":"post-26092","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"month-may","8":"post-type-advocacy","9":"post-type-history-education","10":"year-105","14":"year-2023","15":"has-featured-image"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26092"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26092\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68047,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26092\/revisions\/68047"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"aha-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/aha-topic?post=26092"},{"taxonomy":"month","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/month?post=26092"},{"taxonomy":"geographic-taxonomy","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geographic-taxonomy?post=26092"},{"taxonomy":"post-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post-type?post=26092"},{"taxonomy":"thematic-taxonomy","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematic-taxonomy?post=26092"},{"taxonomy":"year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/year?post=26092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}