{"id":26112,"date":"2022-09-15T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-09-15T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/news\/aha-letter-to-south-dakota-board-of-education-opposing-social-studies-standards-revision-process-september-2022\/"},"modified":"2024-06-17T21:40:42","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T01:40:42","slug":"aha-letter-to-south-dakota-board-of-education-opposing-social-studies-standards-revision-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/news\/aha-letter-to-south-dakota-board-of-education-opposing-social-studies-standards-revision-process\/","title":{"rendered":"AHA Letter to South Dakota Board of Education Opposing Social Studies Standards Revision Process"},"content":{"rendered":"

The AHA has sent a letter to the South Dakota Board of Education\u00a0Standards \u201cregister[ing] strong concern regarding the social standards revisions process undertaken by the Board of Education in 2022.\u201d The proposed standards, as well as the process by which they were developed, fail to meet the AHA\u2019s Criteria for Standards in History\/Social Studies\/Social Sciences<\/em><\/a>. \u201cBy design, the proposed standards omit any and all forms of historical inquiry in favor of rote memorization. There are no references to the practice of historical interpretation, understanding historical context, or critical thinking,\u201d the AHA wrote. \u201cThe AHA\u2019s criteria emphasize that good history education helps students learn to explore issues from various angles; the proposed standards fall far short of incorporating multiple historical perspectives.\u201d<\/p>\n

This letter followed letters<\/a> sent to the South Dakota legislature in February 2022 opposing proposed legislation that would have restricted history education. The legislation did not pass, but similar restrictions against \u201cdivisive concepts\u201d and \u201ccritical race theory\u201d were put in place through an executive order from Governor Kristi Noem.<\/p>\n

\n

September 15, 2022<\/p>\n

Board of Education Standards
\nSouth Dakota Department of Education
\n800 Governors Dr.
\nPierre, SD 57501<\/p>\n

Dear Members of the South Dakota Board of Education Standards:<\/p>\n

The American Historical Association (AHA) registers strong concern regarding the social standards revisions process undertaken by the Board of Education in 2022. The proposed standards and the process by which they have been developed fail to meet the AHA\u2019s Criteria for Standards in History\/Social Studies\/Social Sciences<\/a><\/em>. To adopt and implement the document that the state BOE has proposed would be a disservice both to students and to the state itself.<\/p>\n

The problems the AHA has identified with the proposed standards can be traced to the process by which they were developed. According to the AHA\u2019s criteria, standards should \u201cinclude input from practicing historians, social studies methods professors, and history teachers, who can help attune standards to current research findings and best teaching practices in the field.\u201d In 2021, the South Dakota Department of Education appropriately convened a group composed of a wide range of historians and educators to revise the social studies standards. But Governor Noem cast aside the work of this group before any public hearings were held. The lack of input by experienced educators is evident in the proposed 2022 standards.<\/p>\n

The new standards fail to meet the AHA\u2019s criteria in many ways. They are excessively long and detailed in their prescriptions, yet totally inadequate in their vision of what history learning entails. By design, the proposed standards omit any and all forms of historical inquiry in favor of rote memorization. There are no references to the practice of historical interpretation, understanding historical context, or critical thinking. The AHA\u2019s criteria emphasize that good history education helps students learn to explore issues from various angles; the proposed standards fall far short of incorporating multiple historical perspectives.<\/p>\n

These flaws and shortcomings are the results of an extended, political process that has already undermined the ability of teachers in South Dakota to teach accurate history with professional integrity. In February 2022, the AHA sent letters<\/a> to South Dakota\u2019s legislature strongly opposing proposed legislation restricting history education, noting that the legislation \u201cwould create a climate of fear for students in which trusted teachers could be subject to legal reprisals or highly valued community schools could suffer damaging penalties for teaching a full and accurate account of the past.\u201d When the legislation failed to pass, Governor Noem issued an executive order prohibiting the teaching of \u201cdivisive concepts\u201d and \u201ccritical race theory.\u201d This executive order and the summary rejection of the 2021 standards draft created a climate of intimidation in which professional historians and educators in South Dakota can have no confidence that the proposed social studies standards draft reflects good disciplinary practices, much less high standards of historical scholarship.<\/p>\n

This bears emphasis:\u00a0The standards you are considering would do significant harm to students in your state.<\/strong>\u00a0The substantial gaps in the knowledge, critical thinking skills, and habits of mind taught to South\u00a0Dakota high school students would limit their preparedness for college as well as their access to early college credit. If adopted, these standards would result in ignorance of fundamental understandings about American history, as well as undermine students\u2019 ability to perform effectively on the US History Advanced Placement test or successfully complete college-level dual enrollment courses in US history.<\/p>\n

These proposed standards will also harm students\u2019 employment prospects. As the AHA has documented through our extensive work on career preparedness in history classrooms, the aspect of history education employers value most is students\u2019 ability to communicate with and understand people from different backgrounds. The narrow history education elaborated in this draft would limit students\u2019 exposure to complex and contested voices from the past, making them less competitive job candidates and imperiling their future career prospects.<\/p>\n

The AHA urges you to revisit the 2021 proposed standards, which were part of a process that engaged historians and experienced educators more meaningfully. The 2022 process has been tainted by serious procedural problems and cannot be redeemed to meet the standards of our discipline.<\/p>\n

With 11,500 members, the AHA is the largest membership association of professional historians in the world, representing every historical era and geographical area. Founded in 1884 and incorporated by Congress in 1889 for the promotion of historical studies, the Association provides leadership for the discipline, helps to sustain and enhance the work of historians, and promotes the critical role of historical thinking in public life. Everything has a history.<\/p>\n

I also attach a statement<\/a> criticizing legislative efforts to restrict education about racism in American history, co-authored by the AHA in June 2021 and signed by 155 organizations, including seven college accreditation agencies.<\/p>\n

Sincerely,<\/p>\n

James Grossman
\nExecutive Director
\nAmerican Historical Association<\/p>\n

cc: Governor Kristi Noem<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The AHA has sent a letter to the South Dakota Board of Education\u00a0Standards \u201cregister[ing] strong concern regarding the social standards…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":17025,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"The American Historical Association (AHA) registers strong concern regarding the social standards revisions process undertaken by the Board of Education in 2022.","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"aha-topic":[63],"month":[560],"geographic-taxonomy":[],"post-type":[10,613],"thematic-taxonomy":[45],"year":[106],"class_list":{"0":"post-26112","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"aha-topic-k-12-education","8":"month-september","9":"post-type-advocacy","10":"post-type-history-education","11":"thematic-taxonomy-state-local-us","12":"year-106","18":"year-2022","19":"has-featured-image"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26112"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66663,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26112\/revisions\/66663"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"aha-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/aha-topic?post=26112"},{"taxonomy":"month","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/month?post=26112"},{"taxonomy":"geographic-taxonomy","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geographic-taxonomy?post=26112"},{"taxonomy":"post-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post-type?post=26112"},{"taxonomy":"thematic-taxonomy","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematic-taxonomy?post=26112"},{"taxonomy":"year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/year?post=26112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}